Slide background
Slide background




ECHA’s response to the Global2000 report on glyphosate

ID 4519 | | Visite: 1494 | Documenti Chemicals ECHAPermalink: https://www.certifico.com/id/4519

ECHA’s response to the Global2000 report on glyphosate

Helsinki 08.08.2017

Subject: Global 2000’s report on glyphosate

Further to our initial response (published on ECHA’s website on 13 July 2017), ECHA has fully examined the Global2000 report and provides the attached more detailed response. As indicated in our previous response, this further response will also be published on ECHA’s website.

As noted previously, ECHA encourages and welcomes scientific debate and challenge – it is fundamental to our work. We therefore welcome the scientific content of the report and the challenges it poses on some of the issues raised.
However, we again most strongly refute the allegation made in the title of the Global2000 report and repeated in your response of 17 July. We have not breached the relevant regulations nor colluded with industry in arriving at the scientific opinion which is now considered by the policy makers in deciding whether to renew the approval of glyphosate as a herbicide.

ECHA notes your appreciation for the transparency and openness in welcoming observers from NGOs at the meetings of the scientific committees of ECHA and agrees that it is an important step to promote public trust.

During the plenary meeting in March 2017, ECHA’s risk assessment committee (RAC) delivered its scientific opinion which was different to what your organisation would have liked. RAC’s independent scientific experts assessed glyphosate’s hazardous properties, including carcinogenicity, against the criteria in the CLP Regulation. They considered all the scientific data in coming to their opinion, including both published scientific studies and industry sponsored scientific studies that RAC considered relevant. The Committee used a weight of evidence approach in its assessment, as required by the CLP Regulation.

RAC approached the assessment, as it has done in every other case, without any anticipation of the outcome for any of the hazard endpoints. RAC also does not set out to please any stakeholder organisation with its conclusions. There was no collective preconception of whether or not the substance was hazardous for any of the endpoints, let alone any collusion with industry, as alleged in the Global2000 report. The decision of RAC was reached by consensus, with individual
RAC members contributing their individual views on the subject as the discussion progressed.

Upon examination of all your arguments ECHA concludes that the dossier submitter (BAuA) and RAC have correctly followed all of the legal steps responsibly and with its usual scientific rigour during the process to harmonise the classification and labelling of glyphosate, respecting the CLP Regulation as well as all the OECD and ECHA’s own guidance.

Therefore, ECHA rejects all of the allegations made in the report. Furthermore, ECHA is concerned of an attempt to publicly malign the integrity of EU institutions mandated to ensure safe use of chemical substances in the EU. This is of particular concern, when the process actually provides the opportunity to submit any further data and to make any science-based observations during the process.

Finally, ECHA will at this critical decision-making stage not engage in any public discussion that could be perceived by your or other organisations as ECHA reopening its opinion. Therefore, we will consider your invitation for a public debate after the decision of the policy makers has taken place.

RAC approached the assessment without any anticipation of the outcome and adopted its Opinion on the classification of glyphosate following an independent assessment of all the scientific data.

RAC does not set out to please any stakeholder organisation with its conclusions. Any classification outcome was possible in this case. There was no collective preconception of whether or not the substance was hazardous for any of the endpoints, let alone any collusion with industry, as alleged in the Global2000 report. During the process individual RAC members formed their own views on the subject and at the end the decision of RAC was reached by consensus. RAC came to its conclusion on all the considered endpoints only after considering the overall toxicological profile based on the data in the original study reports.

RAC did not evade or hide any data and no studies were dismissed from the assessment – all important findings were discussed openly and objectively. The methodology has been appropriately applied in the CLH process as prescribed in the relevant

ECHA Guidance documents and relevant OECD guidance.

RAC has considered the evidence for classification from the animal studies, but has noted that the effects were observed inconsistently and generally only at the highest doses which in some cases were very high. Additional factors considered were the lack of evidence for mutagenicity and from epidemiology.

The Dossier Submitter as well as the experts of RAC considered all the relevant data in a weight of evidence determination conducted in accordance with the requirements in the CLP Regulation and applicable guidance, as it has done in every preceding case where the criteria cannot be applied directly to available identified information.

ECHA rejects all of the allegations made in the Global2000 report. Furthermore, ECHA is concerned of this attempt to publicly denigrate the integrity of EU institutions mandated to ensure safe use of chemical substances in the EU. It is of particular concern, when the process actually provides the opportunity to make all the points relevant to the case by legitimate means.

Fonte: ECHA

Collegati:

Glifosato non cancerogeno per ECHA

Pin It

Tags: Chemicals Regolamento BPR

Articoli correlati

Ultimi archiviati Chemicals

Pridina
Ott 21, 2019 24

Piridina

Piridina Monografie IARC vol 77 (2000) e Vol 119 (2019) E' usata come solvente nella sintesi di prodotti chimici e nell'industria. E anche usata come denaturante in miscele di alcol e antigelo, come solvente per vernice, gomma e resine in policarbonato, come intermedio nella produzione di… Leggi tutto
Rapporti ISTSAN 19 2
Ott 21, 2019 22

Rapporto ISTSAN 19 | 2

Rapporti ISTSAN 19|2: I tatuaggi: sicurezza d’uso e criteri di controllo Negli ultimi decenni è stato osservato un aumento della diffusione della pratica del tatuaggio considerata, allo stato attuale, principalmente come una forma di arte del corpo che coinvolge sia le donne che gli uomini e in… Leggi tutto
Solvents for acetylene filling
Ott 17, 2019 61

Solvents for acetylene filling

Solvents for acetylene filling EIGA, Doc. 225/19 Acetylene is a chemically unstable gas which can decompose violently under pressure. The acetylene gas is dissolved into a liquid solvent within the cylinder to improve the acetylene’s chemical stability. This reduces the hazards involved in filling,… Leggi tutto
DDT
Ott 11, 2019 140

Para-diclorodifeniltricloroetano (DDT): R40 possibilità di effetti cancerogeni

Para-diclorodifeniltricloroetano (DDT): R40 possibilità di effetti cancerogeni ID 9263 | 11.10.2019 Il para-diclorodifeniltricloroetano o DDT è un solido incolore altamente idrofobico, con un leggero odore di composto aromatico clorurato; è quasi insolubile nell'acqua ma ha una buona solubilità… Leggi tutto
Ott 11, 2019 129

Regolamento delegato (UE) 2019/1701

Regolamento delegato (UE) 2019/1701 della Commissione del 23 luglio 2019 recante modifica degli allegati I e V del regolamento (UE) n. 649/2012 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio sull’esportazione e importazione di sostanze chimiche pericolose GU L 206/1 dell'11.10.2019 Entrata in vigore:… Leggi tutto
Ott 10, 2019 140

Regolamento (CE) n. 1354/2007

Regolamento (CE) n. 1354/2007 Regolamento (CE) n. 1354/2007 del Consiglio, del 15 novembre 2007 , che adegua il regolamento (CE) n. 1907/2006 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, concernente la registrazione, la valutazione, l’autorizzazione e la restrizione delle sostanze chimiche (REACH), a… Leggi tutto
Regolamento di esecuzione  2019 1692
Ott 10, 2019 143

Regolamento di esecuzione (UE) 2019/1692

Regolamento di esecuzione (UE) 2019/1692 | Regime transitorio per le sostanze soggette a un regime transitorio Regolamento di esecuzione (UE) 2019/1692 della Commissione del 9 ottobre 2019 relativo all’applicazione di talune disposizioni del regolamento (CE) n. 1907/2006 del Parlamento europeo e… Leggi tutto

Più letti Chemicals

Regolamento  CE  852 2004
Mar 06, 2019 20637

Regolamento (CE) N. 852/2004

Regolamento (CE) N. 852/2004 Regolamento (CE) N. 852/2004 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio del 29 aprile 2004 sull'igiene dei prodotti alimentari GU L 139/1 del 30.4.2004 Testo consolidato 2009Modificato da: Regolamento (CE) n. 1019/2008 della Commissione del 17 ottobre 2008 (GU L 277 7… Leggi tutto
Mar 02, 2019 20098

Regolamento (CE) n. 2023/2006 (Regolamento GMP)

Regolamento (CE) n. 2023/2006 Regolamento (CE) N. 2023/2006 della Commissione del 22 dicembre 2006 sulle buone pratiche di fabbricazione dei materiali e degli oggetti destinati a venire a contatto con prodotti alimentari (Regolamento GMP - Good Manufacturing Practices) ... Il presente regolamento… Leggi tutto